Dutch

  Words: Marie bouwt veel mooie huizen
  Gloss: Mary builds many nice.AGR house.PL
  Translation: Mary builds a lot of nice houses
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: komt Jan gisteren bij de bakker; is al het brood op
  Gloss: comes John yesterday at the bakery, is all the bread up
  Translation: (wh/th/en) John gets to the bakery yesterday, (and) all the bread is gone
  Comment: OK in narrative contexts(cf Gert Jan Postma on the forum), and in joke contexts. But "Komt Jan gisteren bij de bakker" needs further continuation, and cannot stand on its own. Hence I set V-S to NO. Which (V-second) languages have narrative V-first, or V first in joke settings? This could be a future development (pehaps for V second languages).
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie bouwt dit jaar twee kamers
  Gloss: Mary build this year two rooms
  Translation: Mary is building two rooms this year
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie heeft Jan hard geduwd
  Gloss: Mary has John hard ge.push.PRTC
  Translation: Mary has pushed John hard
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie belt vandaag haar twee broers op
  Gloss: Mary calls today her two brothers up
  Translation: Mary is calling her two brothers today
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie heeft Jan hard geduwd
  Gloss: Mary has John hard ge.push.PRTC
  Translation: Mary pushed John hard
  Comment: If this sentence is embedded, the auxiliary 'heeft' can immediately precede or follow the participle; dat Marie Jan hard heeft geduwd/geduwd heeft.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Jan woont in een groot huis
  Gloss: John lives in a big house
  Translation: John is living in a big house.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Het pad het bos in begint hier
  Gloss: The path the forest in starts here
  Translation: The path into the forests starts here
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: grot-e huiz-en
  Gloss: big.AGR house.PL
  Translation: big houses.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie heeft met twee mensen gepraat
  Gloss: Marie has with two people talked
  Translation: Marie has talked with two people
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Dit huis is mooier dan die twee huizen
  Gloss: This house is beautiful.er than those two houses
  Translation: This house is more beautiful than those two houses
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Dit huis is mooier dan die twee huizen
  Gloss: This house is beautiful.er than those two houses
  Translation: This house is more beautiful than those two houses
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Jans huis is klein
  Gloss: John.s house is small
  Translation: John's house it small
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Het huis van Marie staat te koop
  Gloss: The house of Mary stays to buy
  Translation: Mary's house is for sale
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Wat lees je? M'n boek
  Gloss: What read 2SG? 1SG.POSS book
  Translation: What are you reading? My book
  Comment: 1SG: “mijn” (strong), “m’n” (weak); 1PL: “ons”, “onze”, (see additional example) 2SG: “jouw” (strong), “je” (weak); 2PL: “jullie”; 2.POL: “uw” 3SG MASC: “zijn” (strong), “z’n” (weak); 3SG.FEM “haar” (strong), “d’r” (weak); 3PL: “hun”.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Wat lezen jullie? Ons boek.
  Gloss: what read 2PL? Our book.sg
  Translation: What are you reading? Our book
  Comment: Two readings (at least): there is a single book being read together, or each reader is reading copies of the same book.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Wat lezen jullie? Onze boeken.
  Gloss: What are you reading? Our.pL book.PL
  Translation: what are you reading? our books
  Comment: multiple books. I am not sure it could be the same book, say a textbook. Dutch speakers out there, what do you think?
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Wat ben je aan het lezen? Een boek van mij/*?het boek van mij
  Gloss: What are you at the read.INF? A book of me /*?the book of my
  Translation: What are you reading? A book of mine/the book of mine
  Comment: Postnominal genitives are pretty fine, as long as the noun phrase is indefinite;
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Een groot genoeg huis
  Gloss: A big enough house
  Translation: A big enough house.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words:  Zij hebben een groot genoeg huis/ (?)Zij wonen in [groot genoeg]-e huizen / **Ze wonen in grot-e genoeg huizen
  Gloss: They have a big enough house/ ? They live in [big enough]-AGR houses/ **They live in [big]-e enough houses
  Translation: big enough houses
  Comment: With singular Ns [a groot genoeg huis] ('a big enough house' is fine. With plural nouns, forcing the agreement to appear lead to speaker variability in acceptablility. Some accept,some reject agreement following the adjectival phrase (behaving like a phrasal affix). I am unaware of any speakers allowing the Agr on the adjective. It is clear where the agreement would go (after the AP). This shows that adjectival agreement in Dutch is a phrasal affix/clitic, and not an inflectional category on the A. This s
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie heeft zo hard gelachen dat Jan vertrokken is
  Gloss: Mary has so loud laugh.PCPT that John left is
  Translation: Mary laughed so loudly that John has left.
  Comment: 'laugh' takes 'have' as perfect auxiliary; leave takes 'be.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Je zal wel niet geloven dat Jan Marie opgebeld heeft
  Gloss: You will yes not believe.PRCT that John Mary up.ge.call.PCPT has
  Translation: You probably won't believe that John called Mary
  Comment: that is homophonous with the neutral singular demonstrative (dat.sg.neut).
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Marie zal hier komen hoewel Jan al vertrokken is.
  Gloss: Mary will come here how.yes John already left is
  Translation: Mary will come although John has already left.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: [[dat hij zich zo verzette] tenspijt]
  Gloss: that he SELF so resisted] despite
  Translation:  ‘despite the fact that he resisted so much’
  Comment: Gertjan Postma wrote on the forum: I know of (possibly) one post-clause subordinator. Usually as stand-alone clause. Does, however, with difficulty, integrate into the sentence. This form does not seem to be part of HK's speech, hence NO
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Pas op! Er lopen twee kinderen op de weg
  Gloss: lit.Fit up! There walk.pl two children on the road
  Translation: Watch out! There are two kids on the road
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: we hebben de vier brieven gisteren ontvangen
  Gloss: we have the four letters yesterday received
  Translation: we got the four letters yesterday
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: wat vind je van deze drie posters?
  Gloss: what find you of these drie posters?
  Translation: what do you think about these three posters?
  Comment: I strongly prefer the demonstrative in the context where there are just three posters on the wall. Maybe the definite determiner is even excluded in this case. The determiner de is perfect however if there are three posters as well as two paintings on the wall. De demonstrative is not stressed.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: ik denk dat Marie gisteren niet met Jan over het weer heeft gepraat
  Gloss: I think that Marie yesterday NEG with John about the weather has talked
  Translation: I think that Mary did not talk about the weather with John yesterday
  Comment: The negation niet is at the left edge of the "VP" ; specific non focused objects must precede niet. The folllowing follow niet: non focused, PPs, (directional, dative, instrumentals, commitatives, localitive, idiomatic PPs, small clause complements/separable particles, and the verb cluster (containing the finite verb in non root sentences, and the cluster minus the finite verb in root environments
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Ik denk dat Marie de brief gisteren niet op de post gedaan heeft
  Gloss: I think that Marie the letter yesterday NEG in de mail done has
  Translation: I think that Marie didn't put the letter in the mail yesterday
  Comment: NEG does not immediate precede V, but the verb phrase. (non focused definite objects must precede niet)
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Jan is niet normaal
  Gloss: John is NEG normal
  Translation: John is not normal
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Hij is geen dokter; Hij is niet normaal
  Gloss: He is NEG-INDEF doctor; He is NEG normal
  Translation: He is not a doctor/ He is not normal
  Comment: With adjectives, the standard Neg is used, but with predicative nouns, NEG is relalized as a negative determiner "g-een" with immediately adjacent indefinite. (g-indef N). Here the form *hij is niet een dokter with the regular negation niet seems excluded, unless een doctor is contrastively focused. On the other hand with predciative adjectives the standards negation occurs. I don't know how to set this property: it could be yes (as it would be done for lesser studied languages on the basis of class, or n
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Hij is geen dokter; Hij is niet normaal
  Gloss: He is NEG.INDEF doctor; He is NEG normal
  Translation: Hij isn't a doctor; He is not normal
  Comment: With adjectives, the standard Neg is used, but with predicative nouns, NEG is relalized as a negative determiner "g-een" . (g-indef N). The form #hij is niet een dokter' with the regular negation 'niet' seems rather bad, unless doctor is contrastive (or polarity is focused.)
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: er is niemand op straat
  Gloss: there is noone in the street
  Translation: There is noone in the street
  Comment: With indefinite subjects, negation is realized as a negative determiner (n-ie-man-d). This is generally the case, and not dependent on the presence of an exsistential predicate, so this property is set to NO.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Tom is niet in zijn kamer
  Gloss: Tom is not in his room
  Translation: Tom is not in his room
  Comment: with a definite subjet.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: er is niemand op straat
  Gloss:  there is noone in the street
  Translation: there is noone in the street
  Comment: With indefinite subjects, negation is realized as a negative determiner (n-ie-man-d). This is generally the case, and not dependent on the presence of an existential predicate, therefore this property is set to NO.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Ik vind deze grote huizen lelijk
  Gloss: I find these big.AGR house.PL ugly
  Translation: I find these big houses ugly
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: A: is je broer naar Parijs gegaan? B. Ja /nee /jawel) *Is/*Is gegaan/*hij is
  Gloss: A: Is your borther to Paris gone? B. ja / no/ yesdid)/ *is/ *is gone/*he is/
  Translation: A. Did your brother go to Paris? yes/no/ (*did/did go/he did /
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: A: is je broer met de TGV naar Parijs gegaan? B. Ja /*wel/ *(ja) is/*Is gegaan/*hij is/ ja, dat is ie
  Gloss: Yes/ *well/ *(yes) is gone/ *yes he is/ yes that is he
  Translation: Yes
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: A: Is je broer met de TGV naar Parijs gegaan? B. nee /*niet/ *(hij) Is niet/ nee, dat is hij niet
  Gloss: Is your brother with the TGV to Paris gone? B. No/*niet/*(he) is not/ no, that is he not
  Translation: Did your brother go to Paris with the TGV? No.
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Is je broer uiteindelijk niet naar Parijs gegaan? B. Nee. (*ja)
  Gloss: Is your brother in the end not to Paris gone? B. No (*yes)
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: A: is je broer niet naar Parijs gegaan? B. jawel. (hij is wel naar Parijs gegaan
  Gloss: Is your brother not to Paris gone? B. Yeswel. (he is wel to Paris gone)
  Contributor: Hilda Koopman

  Words: Jan eet elke dag een appel.
  Gloss: John eats every day an apple
  Translation: “John eats an apple every day.”
  Comment: The example holds as well for auxiliaries. Only the finite auxiliary is fronted.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Elke dag eet Jan een appel.
  Gloss: Every day eats John an apple
  Translation: “Every day John eats an apple.”
  Comment: The example holds as well for auxiliaries. Only the finite auxiliary is fronted.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Appel-tjes eet Jan elke dag.
  Gloss: Apple-DIM.PL eats John every day
  Translation: “Little apples, John eats every day.”
  Comment: The example holds as well for auxiliaries. Only the finite auxiliary is fronted.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Jan zal voortaan iedere dag om 7 uur naar huis fietsen.
  Gloss: John will henceforth every day at 7 o’clock to home cycle.
  Translation: “From now on John will cycle home every day at 7 o’clock.”
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: * Elke dag Jan /hij /'k eet een appel.
  Gloss: Every day John / he / I eat an apple
  Translation: “Every day John / he / I eat(s) an apple.” (* means ungrammatical)
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: * Jan zal eten elke dag een appel.
  Gloss: John will eat every day an apple
  Translation: “John will eat an apple every day.”
  Comment: Only the finite auxiliary can be fronted.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: (*) Wie eet elke dag een appel?
  Gloss: Who eats every day an apple
  Translation: “Who eats an apple every day?”
  Comment: For most speakers of Dutch this sentence is ill formed, ‘er’ needs to be included in this context, and for others ‘er’ seems to be optional.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Wie eet er elke dag een appel?
  Gloss: Who eats there every day an apple
  Translation: “Who eats an apple every day?”
  Comment: For most speakers of Dutch ‘er’ is obligatory in this context, for others ‘er’ seems to be optional.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Hoe-veel appels eet Jan elke dag?
  Gloss: How-many apples eats John every day
  Translation: “How many apples does John eat every day?”
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: Waarom eet Jan elke dag een appel?
  Gloss: Why eats John every day an apple
  Translation: “Why does John eat an apple every day?”
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: * Waarom wie eet een appel?
  Gloss: Why who eats an apple
  Translation: “Why who eats an apple?” (* means ungrammatical)
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks

  Words: * Waarom Jan / hij / ‘k eet elke dag een appel?
  Gloss: Why John / he / I eat every day an apple
  Translation: “Why does John / he / I eat(s) an apple every day?” (* Means ungrammatical)
  Comment: The finite verb must immediately follow the wh-phrase; neither subject clitics nor object clitics are possible.
  Contributor: Lotte Hendriks